U.S. Bank Regulatory Outlook Report Q4 2022 Edition

February 01, 2023

Keeping you informed on topical regulatory matters in the U.S. and Europe.

Financial Stability Board proposes framework for international regulation of cryptoasset activities

On October 11, 2022, the Financial Stability Board (FSB) released a proposed framework for global regulation of crypto assets (the Proposed Framework). In connection with the Proposed Framework, the FSB also issued (1) a consultation regarding the regulation, supervision and oversight of cryptoasset activities and markets (Cryptoasset Recommendations) and (2) a consultative report on “global stablecoin” arrangements (Stablecoin Recommendations).
 

The FSB seeks public comment on the framework and recommendations by December 15, 2022. The FSB intends to finalize its recommendations by mid-2023.

 

Proposed Framework

The Proposed Framework sets forth general principles for comprehensive international regulation of cryptoassets and stablecoin arrangements.

  • The FSB recommends that cryptoasset regulatory and supervisory frameworks be based on the principle of “same activity, same risk, same regulation.”
  • Where cryptoassets and intermediaries perform an economic function that is equivalent to that performed by instruments or intermediaries from the traditional financial sector, the cryptoasset and its associated intermediaries should be subject to equivalent regulation. For example, if the issuance and distribution of a stablecoin or other cryptoasset fulfills a bank-like function, the stablecoin/cryptoasset and its associated intermediaries should be subject to regulation that is consistent with the global standards and regulation that applies to commercial bank activities (e.g., Basel Committee on Banking Supervision capital standards).
     

Cryptoasset Recommendations

The Cryptoasset Recommendations set forth nine proposed recommendations for the regulation and supervision of cryptoasset activities and markets. They are focused on regulatory and supervisory issues broadly and do not comprehensively address specific risk categories.
 

Stablecoin Recommendations

The FSB issued a report with 10 high-level recommendations on the regulation and supervision of global stablecoin arrangements in October 2020. The Stablecoin Recommendations update these recommendations in light of recent cryptoasset market developments. FSB’s analysis of several of the largest stablecoins indicates that most existing stablecoin arrangements do not meet these recommendations and significant improvements are to be made to their governance, risk management, redemption rights, stabilisation mechanisms and disclosures.

 

Our role

U.S. Bank is closely monitoring developments in the crypto assets space and is engaging with the industry on a joint response to the FSB’s consultation.

 

SEC proposes amendments to rules regarding ESG for certain funds and advisers

On June 17, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published two new rule proposals that will impact the fund and investment management industry.
 

Investment Company Names: amendments to the fund “Names Rule” proposal

Section 35(d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 prohibits a registered investment company from adopting as part of its name any word or words that the SEC finds are materially deceptive or misleading. The SEC seeks to update the Names Rule to account for changes in the funds marketplace since the rule was adopted in 2001. Under the proposal, the Names Rule would extend to investment options that meet certain environmental, social or governance (ESG) criteria. The SEC intends the proposed amendments to the rule to modernize and enhance investor protection.
 

Salient points in the proposal are:

  • The requirement for certain funds to adopt a policy to invest at least 80% of their assets in accordance with the investment focus that the fund’s name suggests.
    • This would include requiring the 80% policy for names suggesting a focus on investments that have or investments whose issuers have “particular characteristics,” such as “value,” “growth,” and “ESG.”
  • Clarification that “integration funds” (a fund that considers ESG alongside but not more centrally than other non-ESG factors in its investment decisions) would not be permitted to use ESG or similar terminology in its name as doing so would be materially deceptive or misleading for investors.
  • Enhanced prospectus disclosure requirements for terminology used in fund names, and additional requirements for funds to report information regarding compliance with the proposed names-related regulatory requirements.

 

Enhanced disclosures by certain investment advisers and investment companies about ESG investment practices

The SEC is proposing to amend rules and forms under both the Investment Adviser Act of 1940 and Investment Company Act to require registered investment advisers, certain advisers that are exempt from registration, registered investment companies and business development companies (BDCs) to provide additional information regarding their ESG investment practices..
 

The proposal is designed to provide consistent standards for ESG disclosures, allowing investors to make more informed decisions as they compare various ESG investments..
 

Under the proposal, funds that consider ESG factors in their investment process would be required to disclose additional information regarding their strategy. The level (amount) of required disclosure depends on how central ESG factors are to a fund’s strategy. The ESG disclosure contemplates three types of ESG funds/strategies:

  • Integration funds: Funds that integrate ESG factors alongside non-ESG factors in investment decisions would be required to describe how ESG factors are incorporated into their investment process.
  • ESG-focused funds: Funds for which ESG factors are a significant or main consideration would be required to provide detailed disclosure, including a standardized ESG strategy overview table. These funds would also disclose additional information on the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with their portfolio investments. Funds that disclose that they do not consider GHG emissions as part of their ESG strategy would not be required to report this information.
  • Impact funds: A subset of ESG-focused funds that seek to achieve a particular ESG impact would be required to disclose how it measures progress on its objective.

 

Based on the proposed amendments, funds and advisers would need to adopt new compliance policies and procedures regarding their ESG-related strategies in order to help ensure the accuracy of the various prospectus and brochure disclosures.
 

Industry reaction

The two proposals have raised some pushback in the fund industry. The Investment Company Institute (ICI), an association representing regulated investment funds, provided the SEC with feedback outlining concerns with certain aspects of the proposed amendments. According to their letter regarding Investment Company Names, the proposed changes to the Names Rule are complex, create interpretive challenges, may limit innovative fund strategies and would increase compliance costs that are generally passed on to shareholders as a fund expense. Similar concerns were raised in their letter regarding Enhanced Disclosures by Certain Investment Advisers and Investment Companies about ESG Investment Practices in which the ICI recommends modifications to avoid negative impact on the fund industry while still achieving the goals set in the proposal. Among the recommendations are revisions concerning the ESG fund strategies: alignment of the definition of ESG-focused fund to the current disclosure framework and practices; enhanced disclosure to be required only for ESG-focused funds, but not integration funds; less-prescriptive prospectus disclosure requirements for ESG-focused funds; adjustment of the impact fund disclosure requirements to the current disclosure framework and impact investing practices.

 

ESG and sustainable investments – European focus

ESG and sustainable investing overview

ESG and sustainability continues to be a hot topic for both the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) and will continue to be for the foreseeable future.
 

In Ireland, the number of sustainable funds classified as Article 8 and Article 9 continues to grow and the expectation is that this will be a continued area of interest and growth as investors look to make more impactful investing decisions. In our Regulatory Outlook Report, we take you through some of the key regulatory changes over the past few months. As this is an ever-revolving landscape, we will touch on some of the recent developments briefly in this space.
 

Regulatory framework

Recent regulations include the European Union (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) (Amendment) (No.2) Regulations 2022 The European Union (Undertakings for Collective Investment in Transferable Securities) (Amendment) (No.2) Regulations 2022 (Amending UCITS Regulations) came into operation on September 12, 2022.
 

The Amending UCITS Regulations transpose Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2021/1270 into Irish law and require Irish management companies to:

  • Take sustainability risks into account when conducting due diligence on investments.
  • Where relevant, consider the principal adverse impacts of investment decisions on sustainability factors.
  • Update existing risk management procedures to incorporate the assessment of material sustainability risk which may arise for funds under management.
  • Identify conflicts of interest, which arise because of integration of sustainability risks in their processes, systems and internal controls.
  • Take sustainability risk into account in their organisational structure.
  • Ensure that their senior management assumes responsibility for the integration of sustainability risks in the investment and risk management processes.
  • Ensure that they retain adequate resources and expertise for the integration of sustainability risk.
     

Corresponding rules have been imposed on Irish domiciled AIFMs since August 1, 2022, when the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1255 took effect.
 

ESMA long-term priorities

On October 10, 2022, ESMA announced its long-term priorities from 2023-2028 and unsurprisingly, ‘enabling sustainable finance’ is a key endeavor. ESMA’s other priorities include focusing on strengthening supervision, enhancing the protection of retail investors, fostering effective markets and financial stability, facilitating technological innovation and effect.
 

European Supervisory Authority – increasing regulation

On September 30, 2022, the European Supervisory Authority (ESA) published a final report containing draft Regulatory Technical Standard (RTS) which will amend the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation RTS (the SFDR RTS) due to come into effect on January 1, 2023. The Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) is a European regulation introduced to improve transparency in the market for sustainable investment products, to prevent greenwashing and to increase transparency around sustainability claims made by financial market participants.
 

The SFDR requires asset managers such as AIFMs and UCITS managers to provide prescript and standardized disclosures on how ESG factors are integrated at both an entity and product level. A significant portion of the SFDR applies to all asset managers, whether they have an express ESG or sustainability focus or not.
 

The amendments proposed by the ESAs:

  • Focus on disclosures relating to specific investments in fossil gas and nuclear energy related environmentally sustainable economic activities as part of the disclosures of the taxonomy-aligned investments of a financial product.
  • Make a technical change to Article 55 of the SFDR RTS (which provides that periodic disclosure of taxonomy-aligned investments for Article 8 SFDR financial products is conditional on a “commitment to make investments in economic activities that contribute to an environmental objective within the meaning of Article 2, point (17), of Regulation 2019/2088”) to remove the pre-condition of “commitment.”
  • Make two corrections to cross-references in the periodic disclosures under Article 55 and 62 of the SFDR RTS.
  • Make minor changes to the templates for financial product pre-contractual and periodic disclosures provided in Annexes II to V to the SFDR RTS.
     

Central Bank of Ireland – ESG focus

As we move toward the year end, regulators including the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI), have been keeping a keen focus on ESG matters.
 

In November, the CBI issued an information note: Sustainable finance and the asset management sector: Disclosures, investment processes and risk management.
 

The information sets out the findings of the CBI’s sampling of investment fund disclosures, sets out expectations around the implementation of the SFDR and the Taxonomy Regulation and provides a roadmap for how the Central Bank will supervise these requirements in the future.

 

Key items for consideration

  • From January 2023, the Central Bank expects that any information provided to investors (via fund documentation, marketing material or otherwise) is fully aligned with the requirements of SFDR, the Taxonomy Regulation and related available guidance.
  • Expectation that when a fund classifies itself as an Article 8/9 fund, that this is not merely lip service and that it is clear to investors it is a sustainable product to prevent ‘greenwashing.’
  • Clear quantitative restrictions and rules to measure how the fund adheres to ESG.
  • Disclosures regarding sustainability risks and how sustainable investment is considered as part of the investment decision process.
  • Benchmark index composition should be monitored and screened on a regular basis.
  • As Article 8 funds are not currently subject to any minimum sustainability criteria such as minimum investment thresholds/prescribed composition of investments, the Central Bank supervisory engagement will focus on funds with a low proportion of their portfolio promoting environmental and/or social characteristics.
  • Disclosures in the fund’s offering, constitutional documentation and marketing material should be consistent.
  • Fees and costs should not be disproportionate for Article 8 and Article 9 funds without a legitimate rationale.
  • If the fund engages with securities lending, this should be aligned with ESG characteristics.
     

Furthermore, during a recent keynote speech at the Central Bank Asset Management Sustainable Finance Seminar, Deputy Governor Derville Rowland stated in respect of the CBI’s expectations on the industry:
 

“In light of the above, the Central Bank necessarily has high expectations of the funds sector regarding sustainable finance and has been communicating publicly these expectations over the last two years. We think it is critical that the sector is positioned to support a timely and effective transition to a more sustainable economy, and for this to happen, standards must be high.”
 

The message is loud and clear from the Irish regulator, and U.S. Bank will continue to monitor this arena.
 

There will be a growing focus on how depositaries are ensuring that both UCITS and AIFs are complying to their ESG investment rules. Depositaries will be required to consider how they can monitor compliance from an investment compliance monitoring perspective, reporting and recording of potential ESG breaches and to consider when and if these breaches would be reported in the annual financial statements and to the CBI.

 

Our role

Through our engagement at industry level, U.S. Bank Depositary Services is dedicated to solutioning such requirements and working with asset managers to ensure we are meeting the regulator’s expectations in this dynamic and fast changing regulatory landscape. From our partnership with Sustainalytics, we are comfortable that we can meet the regulator’s expectations and continue to provide thought leadership in this area.

 

For questions or concerns, please contact a member of our team:
 

Lili Popova-Flashenburg

Vice President, Global Network Management Regulatory Review Manager

(United States)

Phone: +8573382167

Email: lili.popovaflashenburg@usbank.com

 

Caroline Geraghty

Vice President, Senior Depositary Manager - Europe

Phone: +353873205938

Email: caroline.geraghty@usbank.com

 

PDF Download

Related content

Ask an expert Q&A: 3 US ETF trends and their impact in Europe

Bank vs. brokerage custody

30-day adulting challenge: Financial wellness tasks to complete in a month

Preparing for your custodian conversion

The latest on cybersecurity: Mobile fraud and privacy concerns

3 European market trends to watch

Rule 18f-4: The limited use exception

Liquidity management: A renewed focus for European funds

Administrator accountability: 5 questions to evaluate outsourcing risks

The ongoing evolution of custody: Tips for renewing your custody contract

IRC Section 305(c): Deemed distributions and related regulations

Rethinking European ETFs: Strategy wrappers and a means to an end

Case study: U.S. asset manager expands to Europe

A first look at the new fund of funds rule

Alternative assets: Advice for advisors

What is a CLO?

What are exchange-traded funds?

MSTs: An efficient and cost-effective solution for operating a mutual fund

Ask an expert Q&A: 3 US ETF trends and their impact in Europe

Mutual fund to ETF conversions: challenges and considerations

The role of a custodian

Custody or safekeeping: What’s the right solution for government investments?

Cryptocurrency custody 6 frequently asked questions

5 questions you should ask your custodian about outsourcing

Insource or outsource? 10 considerations

10 ways a global custodian can support your growth

The reciprocal benefits of a custodial partnership: A case study

The benefits of a full-service warehouse custodian

The unsung heroes of exchange-traded funds

Depositary services: A brief overview

Refining your search for an insurance custodian

Inherent flexibility and other benefits of collective investment trusts

Webinar replay - The view from Europe: UCITS and ETFs in a changing world

Maximizing your deductions: Section 179 and Bonus Depreciation

Third-party vendor risk: protecting your company against cyber threats

Hospitals face cybersecurity risks in surprising new ways

Post-pandemic fraud prevention lessons for local governments

What is CSDR, and how will you be affected?

Proactive ways to fight vendor fraud

5 Ways to protect your government agency from payment fraud

Avoiding the pitfalls of warehouse lending

Fight the battle against payments fraud

Fraud prevention checklist

Complying with changes in fund regulations

Why Know Your Customer (KYC) — for organizations

The password: Enhancing security and usability

How to improve your business network security

Government agency credit card programs and PCI compliance

Cybersecurity – Protecting client data through industry best practices

Webinar: Approaching international payment strategies in today’s unpredictable markets.

Increase working capital with Commercial Card Optimization

Automate escheatment for accounts payable to save time and money

Understanding and preparing for the new payment experience

5 winning strategies for managing liquidity in volatile times

The future of financial leadership: More strategy, fewer spreadsheets

Employee benefit plan management: trustee vs. custodian

Protecting cash balances with sweep vehicles

Delivering powerful results with SWIFT messaging and services

Understanding the role of authorized participants in exchange-traded funds

Look to your custodian in times of change

Middle-market direct lending: Obstacles and opportunities

How RIAs can embrace technology to enhance personal touch

Webinar: CRE Digital Transformation – Balancing Digitization with cybersecurity risk

Protecting elderly parents’ finances: 6 steps to follow when managing their money

4 ways to outsmart your smart device

How to spot an online scam

Disclosures

The information contained in this publication is for general information only and may have been obtained from one of several third-party vendors that have contracted with U.S. Bank. The publication contains information believed to be reliable, but is not guaranteed as to accuracy, timeliness, or completeness. U.S. Bank and its representatives are not providing tax, investment, legal, or any other form of advice by making this information available to you. Your tax and financial situation are unique. You should consult your tax and/or legal advisor for advice and information concerning your situation. U.S. Bank is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services or performance of third party providers. U.S. Bank will not be responsible for updating any information contained within this material and opinions and  information contained herein are subject to change without notice. Any and all implied or explicit opinions or recommendations contained in this information has been written to be informative and does not represent legal, tax, accounting, investment, financial, or other form of professional advice. Investment in global securities markets may involve

significant risks of loss and U.S. Bank is not responsible for investment risks or other losses related to such investments made by you or on your behalf.

 

U.S. Bank Global Corporate Trust is a trading name of U.S. Bank Global Corporate Trust Limited, U.S. Bank Trustees Limited and Elavon Financial Services DAC (each a U.S. Bancorp group company). U.S. Bank Global Corporate Trust Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales having the registration number 05521133 and a registered address of 125 Old Broad Street, Fifth Floor, London, EC2N 1AR. U.S. Bank Global Corporate Trust Limited, Dublin Branch is registered in Ireland with the Companies Registration Office under Reg. No. 909340 with its registered office at Block F1, Cherrywood Business Park, Cherrywood, Dublin 18, Ireland D18 W2X7. U.S. Bank Trustees Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales having the registration number 02379632 and a registered address of 125 Old Broad Street, Fifth Floor, London, EC2N 1AR. Elavon Financial Services DAC  (a U.S. Bancorp Company), trading as U.S. Bank Global Corporate Trust, is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland.  Registered in Ireland with the Companies Registration Office, Reg. No. 418442. The liability of the member is limited. Registered Office: Block F1, Cherrywood Business Park, Cherrywood, Dublin 18, Ireland D18 W2X7. Directors: A list of names and personal details of every director of the company is available for inspection to the public at the company’s registered office for a nominal fee. In the UK, Elavon Financial Services DAC trades as U.S. Bank Global Corporate Trust through its UK Branch from its establishment at 125 Old Broad Street, Fifth Floor, London, EC2N 1AR (registered with the Registrar of Companies for England and Wales under Registration No. BR020005). Authorised and regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and with deemed variation of permission. Subject to regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the Prudential Regulation Authority. Details of the Temporary Permissions Regime, which allows EEA-based firms to operate in the UK for a limited period while seeking full authorisation, are available on the Financial Conduct Authority’s website.

 

All banking services are provided through Elavon Financial Services DAC. U.S. Bank Global Corporate Trust Limited and U.S. Bank Trustees Limited are Trust Corporations and not banking institutions and are not authorised to carry on banking business in the United Kingdom, Ireland or any other jurisdiction.

U.S. Bank National Association is not responsible for and does not guarantee the products, services, performance or obligations of its affiliates.

 

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Ireland) Limited is registered in Ireland, Company Number 413707. Registered Office at 24 - 26 City Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland. Directors: Eimear Cowhey, Ken Somerville, Brett Meili (USA), James Hutterer (USA), Hosni Shadid (USA). U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Ireland) Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland.

 

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Ireland) Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. U.S. Bank Global Fund

Services (Guernsey) Limited is licensed under the Protection of Investors (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2020, as amended, by the Guernsey Financial Services Commission to conduct controlled investment business in the Bailiwick of Guernsey.

 

U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Luxembourg) S.a.r.l. is registered in Luxembourg with RCS number B238278 and Registered Office: Floor 3, K2 Ballade, 4, rue Albert Borschette, L-1246 Luxembourg. U.S. Bank Global Fund Services (Luxembourg) S.a.r.l. is authorised and regulated by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier.

 

Elavon Financial Services DAC, trading as U.S. Bank Depositary Services, is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland and is registered in Ireland with the Companies Registration Office Reg. No. 418442. The registered office is Block F1, Cherrywood Business Park, Loughlinstown, Dublin 18, Ireland D18 W2X7.

 

Elavon Financial Services DAC Luxembourg Branch (trading as U.S. Bank Depositary Services Luxembourg) is registered in Luxembourg with RCS number B244276

and Registered Office: Floor 3, K2 Ballade, 4, rue Albert Borschette, L-1246 Luxembourg, regulated and authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) as well as by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF). Details about the

extent of our authorisation and regulation by the CBI and the CSSF are available from us on request

Start of disclosure content

Loan approval is subject to credit approval and program guidelines. Not all loan programs are available in all states for all loan amounts. Interest rate and program terms are subject to change without notice. Mortgage, Home Equity and Credit products are offered through U.S. Bank National Association. Deposit products are offered through U.S. Bank National Association. Member FDIC.